From owner-cvs-all  Mon Feb 26  0:27:13 2001
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 76D4137B4EC; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 00:27:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mjacob@feral.com)
Received: from beppo (beppo [192.67.166.79])
	by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03391;
	Mon, 26 Feb 2001 00:27:04 -0800
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 00:27:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Akinori MUSHA <knu@iDaemons.org>,
	Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/tar Makefile rtapelib.c tar.1
In-Reply-To: <20010226002530.A21297@hub.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102260026250.69282-100000@beppo.feral.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Would rsh transport tar be by default going to another FreeBSD system, or
would it be going to systems that rsh would be more likely to be in use for?


On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 05:20:19PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
> 
> > Now that CVS_RSH is defaulted to ssh, could it be better to set
> > TAR_RSH to ssh by default too?  (I'm talking about CURRENT here)
> 
> Sounds fine to me!  We've enabled sshd by default for about 6 months now
> (since 4.1.1-RELEASE)
> 
> Kris
> 
> --
> In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
>     -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message