Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 11:49:34 +0100 From: "Koster, K.J." <K.J.Koster@kpn.com> To: 'Michael Adler' <Michael.Adler@compaq.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Preliminary Tuning man page (was Re: Benchmarking FreeBSD (wa s ...)) Message-ID: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E452205FD9C3F@l04.research.kpn.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear Michael,
>
> Actually, it had never occurred to me that soft-updates was a
> property of a
> file-system and not a global flag in the kernel. That is why
> I suggested a more prominent note about soft-updates.
>
Until you suggested it, it never ocurred to me that it could be anything but
a per-filesystem property. When you run the 4.3 /stand/sysinstall it
specifically allows you to change soft-updates setting per filesystem.
I would oppose dmesg output on soft-updates enabling, because it does not
say "mounting /usr, mounting /var" either. How do I know my MFS /tmp is
mounted? How do I even know that /usr/local is mounted? Simple: by typing
"mount", which, conveniently, also tells me about mount options such as
soft-updates.
As a counter-proposal, the soft-updates option should be made a mount option
(which it is going to be IIRC), and described in the mount manual page.
Maybe the GENERIC and LINT kernels could have a text reading "man mount for
more info".
Kees Jan
================================================
You are only young once,
but you can stay immature all your life.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E452205FD9C3F>