From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 12 14:28:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD71F16A4DE for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:28:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mwm-keyword-freebsdhackers2.e313df@mired.org) Received: from mired.org (vpn.mired.org [66.92.153.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11E9D43D45 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:28:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwm-keyword-freebsdhackers2.e313df@mired.org) Received: (qmail 67079 invoked by uid 1001); 12 Jul 2006 14:28:09 -0000 Received: by bhuda.mired.org (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1001); Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:28:08 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17589.1784.567790.215719@bhuda.mired.org> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:28:08 -0400 To: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com In-Reply-To: <20060712141029.35239.qmail@web32707.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060712090019.GA723@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20060712141029.35239.qmail@web32707.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 19) "Constant Variable" XEmacs Lucid X-Primary-Address: mwm@mired.org X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`; h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) From: Mike Meyer Cc: mag@intron.ac, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++ X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:28:10 -0000 In <20060712141029.35239.qmail@web32707.mail.mud.yahoo.com>, pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com typed: > C++ is the de-facto standard for OO: a lot of people know how to use it Oh gods, does this bring to mind lots (and *lots*) of scathing commentary. I'll restrict myself to just one: Windows is the de-facto standard OS: a lot of people know how to use it. We're bright enough to know that popularity doesn't imply technical excellence, otherwise we wouldn't be on a FreeBSD list. Having avoided that trap in the choice of platform, doesn't it behoove us to avoid it elswhere? http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.