From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Jul 19 18:29:27 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id SAA01612
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 19 Jul 1995 18:29:27 -0700
Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.2.210.241])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id SAA01606
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 1995 18:29:25 -0700
Received: by agora.rdrop.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #8)
	id m0sYkQW-0001RcC; Wed, 19 Jul 95 21:29 PDT
Message-Id: <m0sYkQW-0001RcC@agora.rdrop.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 95 21:29 PDT
From: dmd@agora.rdrop.com (Daniel Drucker)
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: 'lock'
Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


I'm not at all sure it's such a great idea to
return the user of 'lock' to the shell after the timeout
period. It might be a better idea to simply log the user out.

Daniel
dmd@rdrop.com