From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 15 21:23:28 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 897DCE82
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 21:23:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pb0-x22d.google.com (mail-pb0-x22d.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22d])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5736B12BC
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 21:23:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id rp16so4622176pbb.18
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 13:23:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=U2OK4SfX5oqzp9M1Be4CCiT2FXzCQ8JXC51ZI4L58d8=;
 b=OBKzN5Dui4hIpmvvNtiwFS7oHHo/s9atTawhSXSq7fCniaZpTd1insZ/NaKd1m2Ebe
 56LRYLoHe+MF/NIAjrdglTkXuF+bfpi7GzmfTpKRPOMbS6xaogLrmy6Ywx098k64+Vim
 wwyZoLSZ2jPMRQ2Kvh0klngK5Q0XX0pov+XY4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=U2OK4SfX5oqzp9M1Be4CCiT2FXzCQ8JXC51ZI4L58d8=;
 b=SUtCxbLogxC46ggY4zi5KU2cOx20g6nTjzPfm8ioOpz4tN4tO+9lS3kmx7qA7vYqVB
 RYUD1sHnotjDQU7A6jxqml7OHanNDgjhq/YqdbhffStnTcqsGNvtvmsSjhkGtaq5EgvV
 ROkz5dFQbilsiuvKfH8N1/Goly5lC4Asf3jksrT9+BE6a2QN1rjIrRWvZJUUgMm5C0HU
 wHucdMg6SPabWPzOd/zOva9i3XSUKqs+QKs9BNBtJAYGPb4xfRNIEmuR0LqmpUwttDFE
 MSzBClwxUQx0u5WbavISXbnwxnJWde5sRfS7ZjrsLBWLnjz2bIOelSOl+xEo6bDyQiUs
 r8UQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkXJbwBAMkX3Fy3CO/GJ9xmzFUwsuLuAMqsPlz9X/lLLEidghjlhuebwbxmY3o0+aFIxMMb
X-Received: by 10.66.221.103 with SMTP id qd7mr16213744pac.44.1387142607894;
 Sun, 15 Dec 2013 13:23:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.70.57.98 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 13:22:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmokeLJv-2PMQfB1CvjXq0zhgx6LUao01jDCF8bh=wCq3vQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <523457A1.3090606@debian.org>
 <CAF6rxgntjNFdr8unFQC=OWCNs7-UDYJaE30v4heWh_EeOg1JGA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+q+TcrSZitbJkPJFO501O1MVWe8o2o+P_S_a3q21NdPtSGewQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-VmokeLJv-2PMQfB1CvjXq0zhgx6LUao01jDCF8bh=wCq3vQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:22:57 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF6rxgkdakYj75en_T1tDthaHciXQ9bvA7xVLhrnsE1Mi5qq4g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IPSEC
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=C3=A9?= <olivier@cochard.me>,
 "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>,
 Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>,
 "debian-bsd@lists.debian.org" <debian-bsd@lists.debian.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 21:23:28 -0000

On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:
> If it's actually improving performance then it's likely some kind of
> data / code alignment / caching interplay. It'd be a good project to
> hunt that down and figure out what's going on.

>From the data presented it *not* improving performance.

I received private mail explaining that it was racy and would panic a
server under heavy
load.