From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jun 10 22:24:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from home.dragondata.com (home.dragondata.com [204.137.237.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4816F14D94 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 1999 22:24:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from toasty@home.dragondata.com) Received: (from toasty@localhost) by home.dragondata.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id AAA09562 for current@freebsd.org; Fri, 11 Jun 1999 00:24:49 -0500 (CDT) From: Kevin Day Message-Id: <199906110524.AAA09562@home.dragondata.com> Subject: More NFS woes To: current@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 00:24:48 -0500 (CDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Grabbed another -current, and are still seeing a few problems yet that Matt and others haven't solved. I'm not pushing anyone, just reminding that these are still here, and still problems. 1) The 'inode/vmopar' lockup that Matt is aware of, and apparently tracked down. 2) Processes starting to runaway doing this: nfs_getpages: error 70 vm_fault: pager read error, pid 1251 (eggdrop) nfs_getpages: error 70 vm_fault: pager read error, pid 1251 (eggdrop) nfs_getpages: error 70 vm_fault: pager read error, pid 1251 (eggdrop) nfs_getpages: error 70 vm_fault: pager read error, pid 1251 (eggdrop) nfs_getpages: error 70 No, i don't know what the user in question did to make this happen, if anything. The process was eating about 70% cpu when i killed it, syslogd was eating the other 30 logging all this. :) 3) Weirdly high load averages. I have two systems, of similar hardware, and similar jobs run on it. System A runs 2.2.8, and has about 300 processes running. System B runs -current, and has about 250 processes running. The processes are doing virtually the same things, and both are heavy NFS clients. System A's load average is about .10, Syetem B's load average hovers around 3.0-5.0. System A: last pid: 1933; load averages: 0.31, 0.10, 0.11 CPU states: 6.2% user, 0.0% nice, 1.9% system, 1.6% interrupt, 90.3% idle 302 processes: 1 running, 294 sleeping, 7 zombie System B: last pid: 77084; load averages: 3.64, 3.70, 4.00 CPU states: 7.0% user, 0.0% nice, 2.7% system, 0.4% interrupt, 89.9% idle 256 processes: 1 running, 254 sleeping, 1 zombie Has something changed in the load average calculation, between 2.x and -current, or is there something actually different going on here? The only hardware differences are that system A uses two de0 cards, and system B uses two fxp0 cards. System A is a PII, and sytem B is a K6-2. (similar speeds) Kevin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message