Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:32:07 -0500 From: "Lt. Commander" <us.navy@outlook.com> To: 'Polytropon' <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Script question Message-ID: <BAY182-W678D0CB18230051E8C1556F4970@phx.gbl> In-Reply-To: <BAY404-EAS8416EA18AF9FAD8C3DED26CCA10@phx.gbl> References: <BAY182-W89C2924F4BDF0D2BD3810DF4BB0@phx.gbl>, <BAY404-EAS148D4B304BB066F07E84004CCB90@phx.gbl>, <20150615015516.b3ea7633.freebsd@edvax.de>, <2609852.Pc7nSdcYla@desk8.phess.net>, <BAY404-EAS3520468CFD04B6982A1487BCCA20@phx.gbl>, <BAY404-EAS42803D52F7023B63CB38AFFCCA20@phx.gbl>, <20150622033037.6cfd270d.freebsd@edvax.de>, <BAY404-EAS8416EA18AF9FAD8C3DED26CCA10@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> ------------------------------------------------------- > Bingo! You got it. Works fine. > > Funny tho, I have used that little sh shell intro for years to lead into > various scripts. This is the first time it didn't work as I had it. > > Oh, well... now it's fixed and that's all that counts. > > Once again many thanks for the help!! > > --Jason > > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------- I received some excellent help on straightening out my scripts, but here;s the reason I need the script and it's maddening that I should even need it if procmail could get it right or my recipes worked. Spamass is doing a fine job of IDing spam, however I've tried all of the recipes to catch emails above the threshold of 6 to no avail on way too many spams. Below follows an example: First, spamass reports: X-Spam-Flag YES X-Spam-Status YES, hits=77.60 required=6.00 This rules are not catching them though and get on through: ## spam :0: * ^X-Spam-Status: YES $SPAM ## spam rule :0: * ^X-Spam-Status:(.*\<)?YES $SPAM ## New spam rule :0: * ^.*(shortcircuit=spam) $SPAM ## Test #2 Catch spam tagged by sa-milter :0: * ^(X-Spam-Status: Yes)|(X-Spam-Flag: YES) $SPAM I don't know what's wrong but certainly need a better set of rules I guess instead of the patch script to snag IPs the "high spams" produce. Anyone with any ideas? Thanks, /Jason
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BAY182-W678D0CB18230051E8C1556F4970>