Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:32:07 -0500 From: "Lt. Commander" <us.navy@outlook.com> To: 'Polytropon' <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Script question Message-ID: <BAY182-W678D0CB18230051E8C1556F4970@phx.gbl> In-Reply-To: <BAY404-EAS8416EA18AF9FAD8C3DED26CCA10@phx.gbl> References: <BAY182-W89C2924F4BDF0D2BD3810DF4BB0@phx.gbl>, <BAY404-EAS148D4B304BB066F07E84004CCB90@phx.gbl>, <20150615015516.b3ea7633.freebsd@edvax.de>, <2609852.Pc7nSdcYla@desk8.phess.net>, <BAY404-EAS3520468CFD04B6982A1487BCCA20@phx.gbl>, <BAY404-EAS42803D52F7023B63CB38AFFCCA20@phx.gbl>, <20150622033037.6cfd270d.freebsd@edvax.de>, <BAY404-EAS8416EA18AF9FAD8C3DED26CCA10@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=0A= > -------------------------------------------------------=0A= > Bingo! You got it. Works fine.=0A= >=0A= > Funny tho=2C I have used that little sh shell intro for years to lead int= o=0A= > various scripts. This is the first time it didn't work as I had it.=0A= >=0A= > Oh=2C well... now it's fixed and that's all that counts.=0A= >=0A= > Once again many thanks for the help!!=0A= >=0A= > --Jason=0A= >=0A= >=0A= > --=0A= -------------------------------------------------------------=0A= =0A= I received some excellent help on straightening out my scripts=2C but here= =3Bs the reason I need the script and it's maddening that I should even nee= d it if procmail could get it right or my recipes worked. Spamass is doing = a fine job of IDing spam=2C however I've tried all of the recipes to catch = emails above the threshold of 6 to no avail on way too many spams. Below fo= llows an example:=0A= =0A= =A0First=2C spamass reports:=0A= X-Spam-Flag YES=0A= X-Spam-Status YES=2C hits=3D77.60 required=3D6.00=0A= =0A= This rules are not catching them though and get on through:=0A= ## spam=0A= :0:=0A= * ^X-Spam-Status: YES=0A= $SPAM=0A= =0A= ## spam rule=0A= :0:=0A= * ^X-Spam-Status:(.*\<)?YES=0A= $SPAM=0A= =0A= ## New spam rule=0A= :0:=0A= * ^.*(shortcircuit=3Dspam)=0A= $SPAM=0A= =0A= ## Test #2 Catch spam tagged by sa-milter=0A= :0:=0A= * ^(X-Spam-Status: Yes)|(X-Spam-Flag: YES)=0A= $SPAM=0A= =0A= I don't know what's wrong but certainly need a better set of rules I guess = instead of the patch script to snag IPs the "high spams" produce.=0A= =0A= Anyone with any ideas?=0A= =0A= Thanks=2C=0A= /Jason =
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BAY182-W678D0CB18230051E8C1556F4970>