From owner-freebsd-current Wed Feb 6 3:42:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com (mailout08.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10F937B41C for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 03:42:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from fwd03.sul.t-online.de by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 16YQTQ-0001UA-04; Wed, 06 Feb 2002 12:42:48 +0100 Received: from Magelan.Leidinger.net (520065502893-0001@[80.131.116.157]) by fmrl03.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 16YQT7-0kM7BBC; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:42:29 +0100 Received: from Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Magelan.Leidinger.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g16BHqZ03604; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:17:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from netchild@Leidinger.net) Message-Id: <200202061117.g16BHqZ03604@Magelan.Leidinger.net> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:17:51 +0100 (CET) From: Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable To: drosih@rpi.edu Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender: 520065502893-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 6 Feb, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > Anything else I should check? I realize there's about a million > differences between the two branches, and there might also be > something about my machine's setup which is a major culprit here. > I'm just looking for a basic idea of what other people have been > seeing for performance when they run current. # ll /etc/malloc.conf lrwx------ 1 root wheel 2B Aug 18 21:47 /etc/malloc.conf@ -> aj Bye, Alexander. -- Loose bits sink chips. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message