Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:39:43 +0100 From: Mike Clarke <jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xerox Phaser 6110 printer Message-ID: <200808112139.43163.jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.1.10.0808111252050.74762@wonkity.com> References: <200808111733.14834.jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk> <alpine.BSF.1.10.0808111252050.74762@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 11 August 2008, Warren Block wrote: > Printers with sole-source drivers like that make me nervous. =A0If the > driver or certain features doen't work on your system, it doesn't > leave a lot of options. > > foo2qpdl doesn't appear to be in ports, but probably it'll build okay > anyway. =A0If it were me, I'd make sure that builds and runs first, > making a port of it. =A0Then test the output on a sample printer before > buying. I'm using CUPS which seems to support the Phaser 6110 via the SpliX port=20 so I assume I wouldn't need foo2qpdl. But rather worryingly pkg-descr=20 lists the 6110 as "Untested". I don't have the necessary skills to hack the driver if things don't=20 work so it looks like I'll probably have to eliminate this model from=20 my list unless I can get any feedback from anybody who is successfully=20 using one with FreeBSD. =2D-=20 Mike Clarke
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200808112139.43163.jmc-freebsd>