From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 10 12:33: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tower1.eicomm.net (tower1.eicomm.net [209.166.167.151]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB4537BA8D for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:32:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jason@detar.org) Received: from detar.org (1Cust91.tnt2.greensburg.pa.da.uu.net [63.24.227.91]) by tower1.eicomm.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA92055; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 15:32:40 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <38C95C45.944DE382@detar.org> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 15:34:13 -0500 From: Jason Detar X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Heckaman Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Subject: Re: FreeBSD SMP in 3.4-stable References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matt, I have quite a few machines with SMP under the stable branch. I'm not real sure how "tested" it is but I have no problems whatsoever. Matt Heckaman wrote: > Hello, > > I have a production server which at this time is a single PII 400. I wish > to put in this machine a pair of PII 400 to reduce the load that's on this > machine. Right now it hovers around 3.00-4.00 load averages, which is just > too high, it's starting to lag the machine some. > > My questions is, how tested and stable is the SMP in FreeBSD 3.4-stable? > As this is a production machine, I cannot afford to have problems with it. > For those of you with experience running SMP under 3.4-stable, I would > appreciate your input. Thanks in advance. > > Matt > -- > Matt Heckaman [matt@arpa.mail.net|matt@relic.net] [Please do not send me] > !Powered by FreeBSD/x86! [http://www.freebsd.org] [any SPAM (UCE) e-mail] > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message