Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 02 Nov 2007 09:28:46 -0500
From:      Jonathan Horne <freebsd@dfwlp.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: curious DNS behavior on a 7.0...
Message-ID:  <20071102092846.cuy1vb3pwsgokog8@webmail.dfwlp.org>
In-Reply-To: <472AB52B.6070102@ibctech.ca>
References:  <200711012041.13641.freebsd@dfwlp.com> <20071102150149.10be61d2@meijome.net> <472AB52B.6070102@ibctech.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Steve Bertrand <iaccounts@ibctech.ca>:

> CONCLUSION:
>
> If the last poster is right and it's only the browser is failing because
> it uses it's own faulty internal DNS resolver, then this is obviously a
> serious hindrance to the implementation of IPv6.

so a browser behavior, and not an operating system or name server =20
behavior?  as far as i know, my name servers dont know how to speak =20
ipv6 either, as they are 6.2p8's without INET6 in their kernel =20
configs.  so, my browser of choice is opera, but admittedly, i dont =20
recall ever seeing a setting i can change concerning this behavior.  =20
how then, would one go about elminating ipv6 behavior from a browser?

> Of course most 'users'
> aren't on the 'Internet' if their MSN page doesn't display, and will
> take the path of least cost to make it work ;)

not sure if that was intended for me or not... if so, my retort is "if =20
i wanted path of least cost (in terms of time and trouble)... i would =20
have just got on my ibook which 'just works'"  (har har  :)  *shrug* =20
all i know is that my other systems that have no ipv6 at all, arent =20
able to produce such behavior.

cheers,
--=20
Jonathan Horne
http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org
freebsd@dfwlp.com

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071102092846.cuy1vb3pwsgokog8>