From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 23 13:19:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB99C16A4B3 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:19:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (mta02-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9608643FA3 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:19:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scott@fishballoon.org) Received: from llama.fishballoon.org ([81.104.195.124]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.comESMTP <20031023200809.GIKJ8170.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@llama.fishballoon.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:08:09 +0100 Received: from scott by llama.fishballoon.org with local (Exim 4.20) id 1ACljR-000HSC-Rt; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:06:53 +0100 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:06:53 +0100 From: Scott Mitchell To: Doug White Message-ID: <20031023200653.GA66377@llama.fishballoon.org> References: <20031022212556.GA48208@llama.fishballoon.org> <20031022153722.P71676@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20031023085231.GA57527@llama.fishballoon.org> <20031023091010.V79600@carver.gumbysoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031023091010.V79600@carver.gumbysoft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p13 i386 Sender: Scott Mitchell cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: aic7896 SCB timeout - is this a sign of impending doom? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 20:19:06 -0000 On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 09:15:25AM -0700, Doug White wrote: > > Yeah, it wouldn't be the first time SCSI backplanes have gone bad. You > have this in an Astor or Columbus chassis? Actually a 'Hudson' SC5000 chassis, with the redundant PSUs and hot-swap cage. They've proved to be at least as - if not more - reliable than the considerably more expensive Proliants that the Windows servers run on. > Unfortunately they run a really old version of the IPMI spec, otherwise I > have some scripts that can inquiry for temperature data. Maybe sometime > I'll get bored and backport the stuff to IPMI 0.9. That would be cool. Let me know if you need anything testing :-) Scott -- =========================================================================== Scott Mitchell | PGP Key ID | "Eagles may soar, but weasels Cambridge, England | 0x54B171B9 | don't get sucked into jet engines" scott at fishballoon.org | 0xAA775B8B | -- Anon