From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 31 08:59:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 19F9A16A405; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:59:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: perforce@freebsd.org Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E0216A402; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:59:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.176.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2E213C442; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz) (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l0V8x6hi028284 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:59:06 +0100 (CET) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.8/8.13.3/Submit) id l0V8x6pt028283; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:59:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:59:06 +0100 From: Divacky Roman To: Jung-uk Kim Message-ID: <20070131085906.GA28186@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <200701310016.l0V0GccJ095661@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200701310016.l0V0GccJ095661@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 147.229.176.14 Cc: Perforce Change Reviews Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 113739 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:59:11 -0000 On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 12:16:38AM +0000, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=113739 > > Change 113739 by jkim@jkim_hammer on 2007/01/31 00:15:36 > > Do not reload %gs from linux_*sigcode(). > This seem to fix TLS on amd64, finally. :-) > > Tested on UP and QEMU. Need more testing on SMP. > > Affected files ... > > .. //depot/projects/linuxolator/src/sys/amd64/linux32/linux32_locore.s#2 edit > > Differences ... > > ==== //depot/projects/linuxolator/src/sys/amd64/linux32/linux32_locore.s#2 (text+ko) ==== > > @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ > NON_GPROF_ENTRY(linux_sigcode) > call *LINUX_SIGF_HANDLER(%esp) > leal LINUX_SIGF_SC(%esp),%ebx /* linux scp */ > +#if 0 > movl LINUX_SC_GS(%ebx),%gs > +#endif > movl LINUX_SC_FS(%ebx),%fs > movl LINUX_SC_ES(%ebx),%es > movl LINUX_SC_DS(%ebx),%ds > @@ -25,7 +27,9 @@ > linux_rt_sigcode: > call *LINUX_RT_SIGF_HANDLER(%esp) > leal LINUX_RT_SIGF_UC(%esp),%ebx /* linux ucp */ > +#if 0 > movl LINUX_SC_GS(%ebx),%gs > +#endif great work! why didnt you just remove those lines but if 0 them? without commit it looks a little strange to someone who doesnt know why/where/how :)