From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Feb 16 9:17:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B62D37B67D for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:17:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from hamlet.nectar.com (hamlet.nectar.com [10.0.1.102]) by gw.nectar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B50C19389; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:17:22 -0600 (CST) Received: (from nectar@localhost) by hamlet.nectar.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f1GHHMk90397; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:17:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nectar@spawn.nectar.com) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:17:22 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: arch@FreeBSD.org Cc: will@physics.purdue.edu Subject: Re: Wish List (was: Re: The /usr/bin/games bikeshed again) Message-ID: <20010216111722.E90210@hamlet.nectar.com> References: <20010216110420.J22030@london.physics.purdue.edu> <200102161631.f1GGVIs28888@cwsys.cwsent.com> <20010216113734.K22030@london.physics.purdue.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010216113734.K22030@london.physics.purdue.edu>; from will@physics.purdue.edu on Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 11:37:35AM -0500 X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 11:37:35AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > So, until we get an answer to that, Heimdal is our best choice... :-) Even if the license is fixed, I prefer the Heimdal code in general. It's cleaner. Granted, the MIT codebase is more mature, more widely used, and better documented. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message