Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:17:22 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: arch@FreeBSD.org Cc: will@physics.purdue.edu Subject: Re: Wish List (was: Re: The /usr/bin/games bikeshed again) Message-ID: <20010216111722.E90210@hamlet.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <20010216113734.K22030@london.physics.purdue.edu>; from will@physics.purdue.edu on Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 11:37:35AM -0500 References: <20010216110420.J22030@london.physics.purdue.edu> <200102161631.f1GGVIs28888@cwsys.cwsent.com> <20010216113734.K22030@london.physics.purdue.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 11:37:35AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > So, until we get an answer to that, Heimdal is our best choice... :-) Even if the license is fixed, I prefer the Heimdal code in general. It's cleaner. Granted, the MIT codebase is more mature, more widely used, and better documented. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010216111722.E90210>