Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:53:06 -0500 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Rob Simmons <rsimmons@wlcg.com> Cc: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com>, Not Going to Tell You <luckywolf19@hotmail.com>, security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possible New Security Tool For FreeBSD, Need Your Help. Message-ID: <20010831165306.T81307@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20010831174446.R50234-100000@mail.wlcg.com>; from rsimmons@wlcg.com on Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:51:43PM -0400 References: <3B8FF3B7.39F7646E@centtech.com> <20010831174446.R50234-100000@mail.wlcg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Rob Simmons <rsimmons@wlcg.com> [010831 16:51] wrote: > Why not require the incoming packets to be spoofed from a preordained set > of IP addresses to obfuscate it even more. Obfuscation isn't security, it is the illusion of it. -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010831165306.T81307>