From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan  4 14:30:22 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457F916A4CE
	for <freebsd-standards@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  4 Jan 2004 14:30:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2980043D45
	for <freebsd-standards@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  4 Jan 2004 14:30:20 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i04MUJFR039340	for <freebsd-standards@freefall.freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 4 Jan 2004 14:30:19 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i04MUJm2039334;
	Sun, 4 Jan 2004 14:30:19 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 14:30:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200401042230.i04MUJm2039334@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Subject: Re: standards/60772: _Bool and bool should be unsigned
X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
List-Id: Standards compliance <freebsd-standards.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>,
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-standards>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>,
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 22:30:22 -0000

The following reply was made to PR standards/60772; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: standards/60772: _Bool and bool should be unsigned
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:23:46 +0000

 On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 05:40:15AM -0800, Bruce Evans wrote:
 >  
 >  We have gcc's stdbool.h in RELENG_4 but don't install it.  It uses:
 >  
 >  % typedef enum
 >  %   {
 >  %     false = 0,
 >  %     true = 1
 >  %   } bool;
 >  
 >  This causes slightly different problems than typedef "int bool".  I
 >  noticed the following:
 
 Also, the standard requires that bool, true, and false are #defines.
 
 Tony.
 -- 
 f.a.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
 MULL OF KINTYRE TO ARDNAMURCHAN POINT: SOUTH VEERING SOUTHWEST AT 4 OR 5
 LOCALLY 6, DECREASING 3 OR 4 FOR A TIME. RAIN FOR MUCH OF THE TIME. MODERATE
 DECREASING POOR AT TIMES. MODERATE TO ROUGH.