From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Jul  9 18:19:30 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA22930
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 18:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Rigel.orionsys.com (root@rigel.orionsys.com [205.148.224.9])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA22887
          for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 18:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from dbabler@localhost) by Rigel.orionsys.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) id SAA16359; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 18:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 18:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dave Babler <dbabler@Rigel.orionsys.com>
To: Don Yuniskis <dgy@rtd.com>
cc: James FitzGibbon <james@nexis.net>, ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: port of Majordomo v1.93
In-Reply-To: <199607092134.OAA18754@seagull.rtd.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960709180814.16322A-100000@Rigel.orionsys.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 9 Jul 1996, Don Yuniskis wrote:
> > I've made a port of Majordomo v1.93, the mailing list manager software. 

> Sorry I didn't take the time to *uninstall* my majordomo setup...
> 
> Why did you opt for UID/GID of 67 (vs. the 54 suggested)... just curious.
> 
I haven't looked at the port, but after much hair pulling my majordomo 
installation was made with the majordomo "user" / POSIX model, which 
requires the UDI/GID of whatever the created majordom account has... is 
this not the 'right' way for FBDS? (The Makefile reference was to BSDI 
being of that flavor, no direct reference to FBSD, of course).

-Dave