From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 07:38:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C261065670; Tue, 12 May 2009 07:38:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from knowtree@aloha.com) Received: from relay.pixi.com (relay.pixi.com [206.127.224.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDC48FC13; Tue, 12 May 2009 07:38:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from knowtree@aloha.com) Received: from leka.aloha.com (leka.aloha.com [206.127.224.85]) by relay.pixi.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n4C6f0Tb004161; Mon, 11 May 2009 20:41:00 -1000 (HST) Received: from [10.0.1.195] (atm-251-63.pixi.com [206.127.251.63]) by leka.aloha.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n4C6ewk9004101; Mon, 11 May 2009 20:40:59 -1000 (HST) From: Gary Dunn To: Alexander Motin In-Reply-To: <4A08B10E.4040702@FreeBSD.org> References: <49FE1826.4060000@FreeBSD.org> <4A07BC4D.7080604@freebsd.org> <4A081868.6010906@FreeBSD.org> <3a142e750905111308o62a11c8em5465ea9aa1cfaebc@mail.gmail.com> <4A08B10E.4040702@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 20:40:55 -1000 Message-Id: <1242110455.2664.9.camel@slate01> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 12 May 2009 11:34:18 +0000 Cc: FreeBSD acpi , freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Current Subject: Re: Fighting for the power. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 07:38:15 -0000 On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 02:13 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: ... > > What's about general effect, the main idea here is the same as in audio > processing: result mostly depends on quality of the worst component. > Your system may just have some other consumers which I don't have. For > example, desktop CPU instead of mobile, desktop chipset instead of > mobile, powerful external video instead of (or even in addition to) > built-in, and so on. > Interesting point. Is there a power consumption benchmark for evaluating hardware for use with FreeBSD? -- Gary Dunn, Honolulu osp@aloha.com http://openslate.net/ http://e9erust.blogspot.com/ Sent from Slate001