From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 12 08:52:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C16818D3 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com (smtp5.hushmail.com [65.39.178.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "smtp.hushmail.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A42C65EC for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B6746026B for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:52:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w7.hushmail.com [65.39.178.32]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id B8A954047E; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:52:02 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:52:02 +0000 To: "Polytropon" Subject: Re: Limiting CPU on some processes on web server From: opendaddy@hushmail.com References: <20150311122656.96F2020341@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150311141347.1013d42d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20150311134232.838ABC0451@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150311144958.3ef9519d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20150311140420.1646CC044F@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150311151157.5baea8b7.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150312085202.B8A954047E@smtp.hushmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:52:04 -0000 On 12. mars 2015 at 1:16 AM, opendaddy@hushmail.com wrote: > >Are you able to successfully limit any processes with it? Over >here it seems to force 0% no matter what. Seems to work fine now. No idea why it showed up as 0% yesterday. Thanks again for your help. O.D.