From owner-freebsd-current Fri May 11 1: 4:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (fw2.aub.dk [195.24.1.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3786837B422; Fri, 11 May 2001 01:04:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4B84Xp80936; Fri, 11 May 2001 10:04:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: DEVFS In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 May 2001 20:18:28 +0300." <20010510201828.A81476@sunbay.com> Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 10:04:33 +0200 Message-ID: <80934.989568273@critter> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20010510201828.A81476@sunbay.com>, Ruslan Ermilov writes: >Hi! > >Just installed recent -CURRENT on my PC, and noticed strange things: > >1) If I don't have devfs line in /etc/fstab, why DEVFS mount is still > happening on /dev, and where? It's done as the first thing in /sbin/init to make sure all device access is done through DEVFS. > >2) Is it valid that multiple DEVFS mounts over /dev are allowed? yes. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message