From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep  6 22:35:22 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EF216A4CE
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon,  6 Sep 2004 22:35:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from storm.uk.FreeBSD.org (storm.uk.FreeBSD.org [194.242.157.42])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6821043D53
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon,  6 Sep 2004 22:35:22 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mark@grondar.org)
Received: from storm.uk.FreeBSD.org (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i86MZBDq036235;	Mon, 6 Sep 2004 23:35:11 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from mark@grondar.org)
Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)i86MZAW9036234;
	Mon, 6 Sep 2004 23:35:10 +0100 (BST)	(envelope-from mark@grondar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: storm.uk.FreeBSD.org: Ugrondar set sender to
	mark@grondar.org using -f
Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])i86MXxen039742;
	Mon, 6 Sep 2004 23:34:00 +0100 (BST)	(envelope-from mark@grondar.org)
Message-Id: <200409062234.i86MXxen039742@grimreaper.grondar.org>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 06 Sep 2004 16:11:43 MDT."
             <20040906.161143.77047315.imp@bsdimp.com> 
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 23:33:59 +0100
From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>
cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Change to output 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 22:35:23 -0000

"M. Warner Losh" writes:
> Consider the following patch.  It includes ....
:
> notice how it explains nicely why it appears that asn1_compile is
> built 3 times (it really isn't, but you have to do the obj, depend and
> all parts).

NICE!

> I've been running these patches, or variations on the theme for over
> two years now.  I'm thinking it would be good to commit to head.

I agree. What might this break? Tinderboxes? Do you have a fix for them
too?

M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH