From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Nov 14 13:44:29 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA08487 for isp-outgoing; Thu, 14 Nov 1996 13:44:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from red.jnx.com (red.jnx.com [208.197.169.254]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA08476 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 1996 13:44:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from chimp.jnx.com (chimp.jnx.com [208.197.169.246]) by red.jnx.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA19757; Thu, 14 Nov 1996 13:42:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (from tli@localhost) by chimp.jnx.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA04452; Thu, 14 Nov 1996 13:42:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 13:42:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199611142142.NAA04452@chimp.jnx.com> From: Tony Li To: stefan@exis.net (Stefan Molnar) Cc: Jim Dixon , John Hay , Chad Shackley , isp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Decision in Router Purchase References: Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I know what you mean but what about for the Ethernet side of it, > isn't that Asynchronous speed in any way related or what were those > numbers for? T1 actually is 3Mbps accourding to Dennis at ET, T1 speed > going in and out combined... When did that happen? We have two right now load ballanced on a cisco 7010. We wanted to change it to a simplex config, but the cisco can not handle it. Not only that, but the copper can't handle it. T1 is by definition a full duplex media. You cannot cause a T1 to be simplex. Tony