From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jun 17 13:14:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA27136 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 17 Jun 1998 13:14:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from echonyc.com (echonyc.com [198.67.15.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA27119 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 1998 13:14:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from benedict@echonyc.com) Received: from localhost (benedict@localhost) by echonyc.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA14425; Wed, 17 Jun 1998 16:14:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 16:14:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Snob Art Genre Reply-To: ben@rosengart.com To: Garance A Drosihn cc: Nick Hibma , FreeBSD hackers mailing list Subject: Re: 2.2.6 CD-ROM : Package dependencies up the creek ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > Shells are an example of a package that you "need" (if > you're really used to some particular shell) even before the install > process itself is over. I just mentioned bash because that's the > shell I "need". Obviously I can get by using other shells, but it > only takes about five minutes before I start missing shell features > which I'm pretty used to. I feel the same way about zsh. I would be happier if the install process were kept shell-agnostic, for what it's worth. Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message