From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org  Fri Feb  5 08:39:48 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90621A4740D
 for <freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri,  5 Feb 2016 08:39:48 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from daniel.bilik@neosystem.cz)
Received: from mail.neosystem.cz (mail.neosystem.cz
 [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:5ab8::10:15])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DAF41861
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  5 Feb 2016 08:39:48 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from daniel.bilik@neosystem.cz)
Received: from mail.neosystem.cz (unknown [127.0.10.15])
 by mail.neosystem.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834D2AF32
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  5 Feb 2016 09:39:45 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.neosystem.cz
Received: from iron.sn.neosystem.cz (unknown [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:5ab8::100:107])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256
 bits)) (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.neosystem.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3F57AF2C
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  5 Feb 2016 09:39:44 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:37:13 +0100
From: Daniel Bilik <ddb@neosystem.org>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: stf(4) on 10-stable
Message-Id: <20160205093713.1c1453f9b5d06a6b366c44db@neosystem.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20160114104937.57e14705ea345ad877db2ed5@neosystem.cz>
References: <20151216170418.3c2ec09dfb87e9d09a026efd@neosystem.cz>
 <20160113091730.381f94e94fa5cb2b90960111@neosystem.cz>
 <20160114104937.57e14705ea345ad877db2ed5@neosystem.cz>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.3)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:39:48 -0000

On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:49:37 +0100
Daniel Bilik <ddb@neosystem.org> wrote:

>> Should I create PR for this?
> Created:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206231

Seems that 10-stable has just entered beta1, so unless some effort is
put into fixing this, 10.3-release is probably gonna ship with broken 6to4
connectivity.

--
						Dan