From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Dec 2 09:34:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966DFC5F940 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:34:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.cupac@mimar.rs) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3751E97 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:34:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.cupac@mimar.rs) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7BA81C5F93C; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796D5C5F93A; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:34:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.cupac@mimar.rs) Received: from mail.mimar.rs (mail1.mimar.rs [193.53.106.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 363FE1E96; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:34:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.cupac@mimar.rs) Received: from mail1.mimar.rs (localhost [127.0.1.128]) by mail.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890629FA8B67; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:33:59 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mimar.rs Received: from mail.mimar.rs ([127.0.1.128]) by mail1.mimar.rs (amavis.mimar.rs [127.0.1.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id kY9flhSZyBcC; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:33:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from mephala.kappastar.com (nat-nat.kappastar.com [193.53.106.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marko.cupac@mimar.rs) by mail.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 817959FA8B66; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:33:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:33:10 +0100 From: Marko =?UTF-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= To: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Cc: Olivier Duchateau , ports@freebsd.org, Ben Woods Subject: Re: Thunar is slow when browsing automounted NFS shares Message-ID: <20161202103310.5a100f9a@mephala.kappastar.com> In-Reply-To: <20161201212237.4287cf16133ab7bb3ede8074@gmail.com> References: <20161201143456.26afb284@efreet.kappastar.com> <20161201212237.4287cf16133ab7bb3ede8074@gmail.com> Organization: Mimar X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 09:34:04 -0000 I'm including xfce mailing list as well. On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 21:22:37 +0100 Olivier Duchateau wrote: > There's a mailing list for Xfce related questions :) I have just subscribed. I guess it was about time after using it for more than 5 years as primary DE :) > Before I want to know, if Thunar is running in daemon mode (for > faster startup). I don't think so. > Can you display result of ps x | grep thunar? pacija@efreet:~ % ps x | grep Thunar 1241 v4 S 0:01,07 /usr/local/bin/Thunar (thunar) 1454 1 R+ 0:00,00 grep Thunar > NFS bug is well known, fixes since 1.5.x (according to Xfce's bug > tracker). In fact problem often comes from gvfs (in your case > gvfsd-network). I'm at Thunar-1.6.10_2, gvfs-1.26.3_2. I don't see gvfsd-network in ps: pacija@efreet:~ % ps x | grep gvfs 1163 - I 0:00,03 /usr/local/libexec/gvfsd 1171 - S 0:00,08 /usr/local/libexec/gvfs-hal-volume-monitor 1173 - I 0:00,03 /usr/local/libexec/gvfs-gphoto2-volume-monitor 1243 - I 0:00,02 /usr/local/libexec/gvfsd-metadata 1245 - S 0:00,10 /usr/local/libexec/gvfsd-trash --spawner :1.8 /org/gt= k/gvfs/exec_spaw/0 1465 1 S+ 0:00,00 grep gvfs > If you change value of AutoMount (true -> false) > in /usr/local/share/gvfs/mounts/network.mount is there notable > changes? Did the change but no improvements. On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 22:42:54 +0000 Ben Woods wrote: > I noticed this exact same behaviour last night, when I set up > autofs(5) for the first time. I thought that from '...automounted NFS shares' in subject it will be clear that I am using autofs, but I see now I should explain it in more detail. My auto_master: pacija@efreet:~ % sudo cat /etc/auto_master /net -hosts -nobrowse,nosuid,intr How client sees exports on server: pacija@efreet:~ % showmount -E mephala /usr/home/pacija/Music > Olivier: My understanding was that the autofs(5) behaviour should be > transparent to thunar, and therefore it should not be related to gvfs > at all? This was my understanding as well. Perhaps some fight between the two? Regards, --=20 Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. After enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. Marko Cupa=C4=87 https://www.mimar.rs/