From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 23 12:36:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8744B8A3 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 12:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1E62600 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 12:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C642133C18 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:36:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id AF7DC3980E; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:36:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mouse does not work with new Xorg, works with old Xorg (9.3-STABLE) References: <53CF5FED.1030002@dumbbell.fr> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:36:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <53CF5FED.1030002@dumbbell.fr> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Jean-S=E9ba?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?stien_P=E9dron=22's?= message of "Wed, 23 Jul 2014 09:10:37 +0200") Message-ID: <44y4vkckwf.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 12:36:10 -0000 Jean-S=E9bastien P=E9dron writes: > On 22.07.2014 18:29, Pete French wrote: >> First time after boot it works, stop X and sttart it again, it does >> not work, but unpligging the mouse and pluggin it back in seems to >> get it to work again. > > Could you please post both /var/log/Xorg.0.log and > /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old, after you started that second X session, but > before unplugging/plugging your mouse in? That sounds more like devfs than devd, no?