From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 20 15:49:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD508BC0BAA for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 15:49:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [185.24.122.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D72F1BA2 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 15:49:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from crayon2.yoonka.com (crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u7KFngx7009246 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 15:49:42 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Subject: Re: graphics/gd marked as broken? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <31afe4b6-a935-9908-1291-62a72c57668d@gjunka.com> <5ec06b5f-4628-8c0f-a8d8-825e20aa74c5@utanet.at> <9872898a-e35d-b54b-1094-a1d42323cac8@FreeBSD.org> From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 15:49:42 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9872898a-e35d-b54b-1094-a1d42323cac8@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 15:49:45 -0000 On 20/08/2016 11:40, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 20/08/2016 9:17 PM, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: >> Only WEBP is broken, make sure the option is set to off. > Do you think the (error) messaging be improved to make it more obvious > to users what's the fail condition is, but more importantly, also what > they should/could do about it? > > The current message does neither. > > ./koobs > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Wait, so what it actually means that the port is marked as broken? I understood that the maintainer marked the port as broken because it discovered that the port doesn't compile because of circular dependency? Who then actually marked the port as broken? Greg