Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:22:53 +0300 From: Max Brazhnikov <makc@issp.ac.ru> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Steve Franks <bahamasfranks@gmail.com>, Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>, Olivier SMEDTS <olivier@gid0.org>, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru>, Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> Subject: Re: how to install a port without install: in the Makefile Message-ID: <200901231622.53940.makc@issp.ac.ru> In-Reply-To: <op.un7nnoz79aq2h7@localhost> References: <539c60b90901191200n66f37c76k749ebbb829378cb9@mail.gmail.com> <a01628140901230147y2be65b4eu66e7250f4d078c45@mail.gmail.com> <op.un7nnoz79aq2h7@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 06:58:02 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:47:38 -0600, Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> > > > > wrote: > >> * Florent Thoumie (flz@xbsd.org) wrote: > >>> > If it's just a single file, the preferred way is to add > >>> > > >>> > PLIST_FILES= bin/program_name > >>> > > >>> > to the Makefile and not use pkg-plist at all. > >>> > >>> No, no, no. > >>> > >>> This is not *preferred*. > >> > >> Is it not? Why? There's no reason to introduce pkg-plist for just > >> a single file. > > > > This is just an alternative way of doing it. I, for one, don't like > > it. Same goes for PLIST_DIRS. > > +1 You are lucky guys you have not lived in USSR. otherwise you'd surely like alternative ways :) Max
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200901231622.53940.makc>