Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 06:56:15 +0000 From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> To: Frank Shute <frank@shute.org.uk> Cc: Masoom Shaikh <masoom.shaikh@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: local copy of handbook Message-ID: <20081230065615.7224f2c7@gluon> In-Reply-To: <20081230061251.GA80902@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <b10011eb0812282046j7b784d82q492c8b10cb46db06@mail.gmail.com> <20081229124558.43cefc56@gumby.homeunix.com> <200812292039.43242.masoom.shaikh@gmail.com> <20081229202717.GA78262@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <20081229214319.65a008a1@gluon> <20081230061251.GA80902@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 06:12:51 +0000 Frank Shute <frank@shute.org.uk> wrote: > As Giorgios points out, the docs aren't branched. > > I'll try & make it clearer on that page that it's only for > SUPFILE(source) that there is a branch you have to follow. > PORTSSUPFILE(ports) & DOCSUPFILE(docs) are just given the current tag, > which they should have by default. Sorry I missed where you say to use the doc-supfile; I thought both src and doc were being fetched using a single cvsupfile like in Masoom's original email. On reading the page again it's actually quite clear that you should use the standard doc-supfile which will contain the correct tag line. -- Bruce Cran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081230065615.7224f2c7>