From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 30 12:58:47 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD342C5F
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:58:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com (mail-wg0-x22d.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 797941591
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:58:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wgen6 with SMTP id n6so61332603wge.3
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 05:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
 :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition
 :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent;
 bh=vikAx7c621OZtNizLFm5PPndrEqWdOchtkIirGAeQzs=;
 b=SU/ghXFEEonDwNjZQJ3hQJqG8xFrbq6EvI6V6X/NhamRoOpYJeKrRgmhg7ysrx8/c/
 LqnyOTPA+BgaA8FhTKEvBoY0Qq1Jnm01MOUoEpFyQ4KajUFTwkq2UOu7Qa73XVTmZHX/
 nRzE4BJiEHMeIgWmHj5c5uITFYBsEi11GD/iSkKDzGpMsUZt+Uyjm8luHbQjhF/M9FxM
 OcI6aBJc0tlNPfPdjZMIut1L1tFhyYhRH2sTcSK7S7l9iZ7n8GmwNzCviDGPHnMUrt/4
 UvtDtadRasiS+3bGHlpWhQijP/zZSWc9LWveUrcTyZmOcy0NSESmUrw94SazRNTjdfEw
 bnYg==
X-Received: by 10.180.9.78 with SMTP id x14mr5367258wia.69.1430398725934;
 Thu, 30 Apr 2015 05:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brick.home (evn226.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl. [83.20.211.226])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n1sm2391601wix.0.2015.04.30.05.58.44
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Thu, 30 Apr 2015 05:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= <etnapierala@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:58:42 +0200
From: Edward Tomasz =?utf-8?Q?Napiera=C5=82a?= <trasz@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Enabling RACCT/RCTL in GENERIC.
Message-ID: <20150430125842.GA1977@brick.home>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
References: <20150429110304.GA3377@brick.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20150429110304.GA3377@brick.home>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:58:48 -0000

On 0429T1303, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> Hi.  With the patch I've just committed, the cost of compiling with RACCT
> and RCTL is just a subroutine call and an unlocked variable check, in a few
> places.  I'd like to add "options RACCT", "options RCTL", and "options
> RACCT_DISABLED", to GENERIC on amd64, and MFC it before 10.2.  What do you
> think?  Thanks!

https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2407