From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 8 15:35:05 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id PAA22399 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 8 Feb 1995 15:35:05 -0800 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA22393 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 1995 15:35:02 -0800 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.8/jtpda-5.0) with SMTP id AAA05430 ; Thu, 9 Feb 1995 00:36:35 +0100 Received: by blaise.ibp.fr (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA20451; Thu, 9 Feb 95 00:34:24 +0100 From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier ROBERT) Message-Id: <9502082334.AA20451@blaise.ibp.fr> Subject: Re: uucico fails without '-x11'? To: smcarey@mailbox.syr.edu (Shawn M. Carey) Date: Thu, 9 Feb 1995 00:34:23 +0100 (MET) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: <9502082305.AA16280@kong.syr.edu> from "Shawn M. Carey" at Feb 8, 95 06:05:20 pm X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.1.0-Development ctm#307 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23beta2] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 696 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > working between our 1.1.5 systems. We have learned that uucico works > when we ask it to produce debug output, but fails if we don't. Is > this well known, or is it more likely a problem with our configuration? > Is there a patch somewhere I can get my mits on? Thanks for any help. It must be something in your configuration. I've never seen that and I'm using (well was as I'm under 2.1 now) using 1.05 under 1.1.5.1 for months. I've never had any problem of that kind. Weird. In what way does it fails ? Do you get any message in the logs ? -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD keltia 2.1.0-Development #18: Thu Jan 26 22:22:16 MET 1995