Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:45:56 +0100 From: "Marco Trentini" <marco@datasked.com> To: "FreeBSD gnats submit" <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org> Subject: docs/165557: Minor fix in Porter's Handbook Message-ID: <1330530356.2395@datasked.com> Resent-Message-ID: <201202291600.q1TG0Rkd013307@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 165557
>Category: docs
>Synopsis: Minor fix in Porter's Handbook
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-doc
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Wed Feb 29 16:00:27 UTC 2012
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Marco Trentini
>Release: FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE i386
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:15:25 UTC 2012
root@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
>Description:
In the section "Using CVS to Make Patches" there is a reference to "Using CVSup". In that context, would not it be more correct a reference to the section "Anonymous CVS"?
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
--- porters-handbook.diff begins here ---
Index: book.sgml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml,v
retrieving revision 1.1168
diff -u -r1.1168 book.sgml
--- book.sgml 19 Feb 2012 19:59:48 -0000 1.1168
+++ book.sgml 29 Feb 2012 15:21:49 -0000
@@ -10075,9 +10075,9 @@
</callout>
<callout arearefs="R-CVSROOT">
- <para>R_CVSROOT is any public cvs server, take your pick
- from the list in the <ulink
- url="&url.books.handbook;/cvsup.html">&os;
+ <para>R_CVSROOT is any public cvs server, see how to use cvs
+ in the <ulink
+ url="&url.books.handbook;/anoncvs.html">&os;
Handbook</ulink>.</para>
</callout>
--- porters-handbook.diff ends here ---
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1330530356.2395>