From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 2 01:11:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBF216A41F; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 01:11:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar@mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw) Received: from www.mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw (www.mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw [140.138.150.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4041D43D46; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 01:11:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avatar@mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw) Received: by www.mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw (qmail, from userid 1000) id 7199C5072C7; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 09:11:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw (qmail) with ESMTP id 6C4185072B1; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 09:11:46 +0800 (CST) Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 09:11:46 +0800 (CST) From: Tai-hwa Liang To: John Baldwin In-Reply-To: <200508011522.27593.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <0508020904476.32192@www.mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw> References: <20050728.091810.85228740.imp@bsdimp.com> <20050729.000202.74568315.imp@bsdimp.com> <05072914090418.26779@www.mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw> <200508011522.27593.jhb@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: vova@fbsd.ru, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: owi build broken in recent 7-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 01:11:49 -0000 On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday 29 July 2005 02:13 am, Tai-hwa Liang wrote: >> On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, M. Warner Losh wrote: >>> In message: <05072911422415.24212@www.mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw> >>> >>> Tai-hwa Liang writes: >>> : I'm wondering about whether the "old wi ad-hoc" and AHDEMO in if_wi >>> : are the same... >>> >>> They are. >> >> Hmm... Vladimir, would you please also try to patch your if_wi with: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~avatar/if_wi.c.patch >> >> and see whether it fixes the wi adhoc issue for you? > > FYI, the patch seems to lose setting of the WEP capability from an initial > glance. Apart from the AHDEMO and PMGT flag, the patch also honours the WEP supporting flag reported by firmware. Search for IEEE80211_C_WEP and you'll find out that it will be flagged later if the firmware supports that. -- Thanks, Tai-hwa Liang