From owner-freebsd-security Thu Aug 29 4: 0: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0135337B400 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 04:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from portal.eltex.ru (eltex-gw2.nw.ru [195.19.203.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C04A43E42 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:59:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ark@eltex.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by portal.eltex.ru (8.12.3/8.11.3) id g7TAxVUi044694; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:59:31 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ark@eltex.ru) Received: from yaksha.eltex.ru (root@yaksha.eltex.ru [195.19.198.2]) by portal.eltex.ru (8.12.3/8.11.3av) with SMTP id g7TAxPsk044686; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:59:25 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ark@eltex.ru) From: ark@eltex.ru Received: by yaksha.eltex.ru (ssmtp TIS-1.1alpha, 17 Jan 2002); Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:43:39 +0400 Received: from undisclosed-intranet-sender id smtpdWZ5632; Thu Aug 29 14:43:28 2002 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:48:23 +0400 Message-Id: <200208291048.OAA26785@paranoid.eltex.ru> In-Reply-To: <87k7mamc2s.fsf@snark.piermont.com> from ""Perry E. Metzger" " Organization: "Klingon Imperial Intelligence Service" Subject: Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd) To: perry@piermont.com Cc: misc@openbsd.org, mipam@ibb.net, Matthias@paranoid.eltex.ru, Buelow@paranoid.eltex.ru, , Stefan@paranoid.eltex.ru, =?iso-8859-1?q?Kr=FCger?=@paranoid.eltex.ru, , freebsd-security@freebsd.org, tech-security@netbsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: by Eltex TC Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Keep in mind that there are people who *spend* money on custom designed hardware and there are people who just have _access_ to custom designed hardware that costs millions of dollars. (i.e. in mid-90s when my hat was black i used to have access to data downloaded from damn expensive military satellite sniffer, no kidding) "Perry E. Metzger" said : > > Mipam writes: > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:57:55PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote: > > > >and maybe we should update our rc scripts, > > > >so that ssh-keygen generates at least 1280 Bit keys > > > > > > I think this is highly overrated and only of theoretical > > > value for most *BSD users. > > > > I dont think its too much overrated and theoretical. > > I do. If someone with millions of dollars to spend on custom designed > hardware wants to break into your computer, I assure you that > increasing the size of your ssh keys will not stop them. Nor, for that > matter, would the slow and tedious process of cracking your ssh keys > be nearly as efficient as the more pragmatic alternatives. > > That said, those running on newer hardware can probably reasonably use > larger keys if they wish. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ {::} {::} {::} CU in Hell _| o |_ | | _|| | / _||_| |_ |_ |_ (##) (##) (##) /Arkan#iD |_ o _||_| _||_| / _| | o |_||_||_| [||] [||] [||] Do i believe in Bible? Hell,man,i've seen one! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message