From owner-freebsd-atm  Fri Dec  6 14:00:54 1996
Return-Path: <owner-atm>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA13132
          for atm-outgoing; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 14:00:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from silver.sms.fi (root@silver.sms.fi [194.111.122.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id OAA13127
          for <freebsd-atm@freebsd.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 14:00:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from pete@localhost) by silver.sms.fi (8.7.6/8.7.3) id AAA01109; Sat, 7 Dec 1996 00:00:27 +0200 (EET)
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1996 00:00:27 +0200 (EET)
Message-Id: <199612062200.AAA01109@silver.sms.fi>
From: Petri Helenius <pete@sms.fi>
To: "Jin Guojun[ITG]" <jin@george.lbl.gov>
Cc: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org, jonny@mailhost.coppe.ufrj.br,
        aimeusaco@rivendel.lin.ufrj.br
Subject: Re: ATM drivers
In-Reply-To: <199612062135.NAA29106@george.lbl.gov>
References: <199612062135.NAA29106@george.lbl.gov>
Sender: owner-atm@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Jin Guojun[ITG writes:
 > Zeitnet PCI ATM card is support under FreeBSD 2.1.x and 2.2, as well as BSDi
 > BSD/OS 2.0 or later. I am working on the loadable driver for FreeBSD 2.2 now.
 > This is official release (since Feb/96; info@zeitnet.com).
 > 
I tried to browse their WWW site for information on the platform
support and could only come up with microsoftish OS's for the PCI
card.

So if they have been supporting it for almost a year, why they are not
talking about it? Or is there a spelling mistake?

Pete