From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep 12 12:24:48 2014
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FC32B09;
 Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:24:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6F9199D;
 Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:24:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.132] (vie-188-118-244-060.dsl.sil.at
 [188.118.244.60])
 by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34C463F47F;
 Fri, 12 Sep 2014 08:24:46 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:24:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r351936 - in head: . Mk Mk/Uses archivers/libcomprex
 archivers/libdynamite archivers/liborange archivers/librtfcomp
 archivers/lzo2
 archivers/ucl archivers/unshield audio/gstreamer1-plug...
In-Reply-To: <20140709161049.600ed308@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1409121421070.2669@tuna.site>
References: <201404231325.s3NDPHrv045503@svn.freebsd.org>
 <alpine.LSU.2.11.1406301209040.30120@tuna.site>
 <20140702164609.000d0561@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
 <alpine.LSU.2.11.1407090149080.6008@tuna.site>
 <20140709161049.600ed308@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:24:48 -0000

On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> The primary difference I can see if I add USES=libtool on top is that
>> I get a couple of libraries like the following ones:
>> 
>>   prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libstdc++.so.6.0.21
>>   prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libstdc++.so.6.0.21-gdb.py
>>   prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libcilkrts.so.5.0.0
>>   prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libssp.so.0.0.0
>>   prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libquadmath.so.0.0.0
>>   prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libgfortran.so.3.0.0
>>   prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libobjc.so.4.0.0
>>   prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libgcj.so.15.0.0
>>   prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libgij.so.15.0.0
>>   prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libgcj-tools.so.15.0.0
>>   prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libgomp.so.1.0.0
>>   prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libitm.so.1.0.0
>>   prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libatomic.so.1.1.0
>>   prefix/gcc410/libexec/gcc410/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd10.0/4.10.0/liblto_plugin.so.0.0.0
>> 
>> So, should I still add USES=libtool to these ports?
> Yes.  This new version scheme reduces future library version bumps.

I think I get that in general, but how so in case of the lang/gcc* ports?

Due to libgcc_s.so, among others, I do not see how PORTREVISION bumps
are reduced when upgrading lang/gcc (which is the only case where we
have had to do this).

(This is why I had not gone ahead making this change, but see that you
know committed this yesterday.)

Gerald