From owner-freebsd-security Mon Jan 1 7:25:39 2001 From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 1 07:25:37 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA4037B400 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2001 07:25:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by gw.nectar.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D0F4D193E2; Mon, 1 Jan 2001 09:25:34 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 09:25:34 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Roman Shterenzon Cc: Warner Losh , security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposed modification to ftpd Message-ID: <20010101092534.B35186@spawn.nectar.com> References: <200101010625.f016Pqs13614@billy-club.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from roman@xpert.com on Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 10:05:33AM +0200 X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: nectar@nectar.com Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 10:05:33AM +0200, Roman Shterenzon wrote: > On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > > > While the syntax is ugly, I agree that it would be useful to have in > > our ftpd. [snip] > Perhaps it's possible to leave the delimeter as an option, which defaults > to "/./"? Or I'm missing the point? It is "/./" so that the result is still a valid path. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message