From owner-freebsd-isp Mon May 20 6:52:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from floyd.gnulife.org (floyd.gnulife.org [199.86.41.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6AC337B40A for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 06:52:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by floyd.gnulife.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2840043280; Mon, 20 May 2002 09:02:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by floyd.gnulife.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E164309D for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 09:02:26 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 09:02:25 -0500 (CDT) From: Jamie Ostrowski To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Moving from Sun to FreeBSD on x86 Message-ID: <20020520085330.M39304-100000@floyd.gnulife.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org We retired an old Sun machine here a while ago and moved the web sites over to 4.5 release on a x86 machine. We noticed that one of the sites that used a hashed database quit working. Someone mentioned that the bit order on Sun's is different than FreeBSD on x86 and that we may need to "re-index" the database. From what I can see, their database directory contains .pag and .dir files, and I am not much of a perl programmer, but the source calls the files with dbm. Has anyone run into this before? Not sure what to make of it. - Jamie ************************************ "Nothing astonishes men so much as common sense and plain dealing." *********************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message