From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jun 19 01:10:55 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA15113 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 01:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA15105 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 01:10:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.62 #1) id 0wecG6-0003HE-00; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 01:07:58 -0700 Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 01:07:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius To: Joerg Wunsch cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RiscBSD speed In-Reply-To: <19970618230948.EJ13870@uriah.heep.sax.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 18 Jun 1997, J Wunsch wrote: > > FreeBSD doesn't > > run on most of those platforms. Plus, the benchmarks were run on FreeBSD > > 2.1, but which 2.1? 2.1.0, 2.1.5, 2.1.6, 2.1.7? > > The picture mentioned 2.1-S, presumably meaning 2.1-stable. Of what vintage? Not anymore helpful... > -- > cheers, J"org > > joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE > Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) > > Tom