Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:42:17 +0200 From: Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Sebastian Schulze Struchtrup <seb@struchtrup.com> Subject: Re: alternative options for ports Message-ID: <200410122242.33167.4711@chello.at> In-Reply-To: <416C35A5.4040703@vonostingroup.com> References: <416C0DE8.3000004@struchtrup.com> <416C35A5.4040703@vonostingroup.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 12 October 2004 21:51, Frank Laszlo wrote: > I personally do not like dialog's in ports, period. It makes unattended > builds a pain, mostly when compiling large ports with an extensive list > of depends, you never know which dependency is going to pop up a dialog > in the middle of an all-night build. A target 'config-recursive' would be a nice idea. - -- Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> | OpenPGP KeyID 0x3BCA53BE OpenPGP-Key at hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net and http://pgp.mit.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBbEG509WjGjvKU74RAhreAJ9Um8ZEww39jlF3g7LOWvtql5T5OACfXXY+ Is2tpvUQGjXH3EuoCy9O8cU= =Iy8k -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410122242.33167.4711>