Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 20:31:47 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_P=EAkala?= <pawel@FreeBSD.org> To: Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r351554 - head/Mk Message-ID: <20140418203147.39f056f8@caprica.slowicza.org> In-Reply-To: <20140418174725.GD3573@mouf.net> References: <201404181731.s3IHVDK0062215@svn.freebsd.org> <20140418174725.GD3573@mouf.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dnia 2014-04-18, o godz. 17:47:27 Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org> napisa=B3(a): > Thanks! I have run into that too. I wonder about the case of doing > makepatch on an existing port and not knowing that you needed to > delete a patch. Would it be a good idea to emit a warning or > something when you would have generated an empty patch? Warning seems like a good idea.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140418203147.39f056f8>