From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 27 09:16:28 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA04558 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 09:16:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from bacall.lodgenet.com (mail@[205.138.147.242]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA04549 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 09:16:26 -0800 (PST) Received: (from mail@localhost) by bacall.lodgenet.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id LAA29105 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 11:10:09 -0600 Received: from tserv.lodgenet.com(204.124.120.10) by bacall via smap (V1.3) id sma029097; Tue Feb 27 11:09:59 1996 Received: from jake.lodgenet.com (jake.lodgenet.com [204.124.120.30]) by tserv.lodgenet.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA23593; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 10:34:50 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jake.lodgenet.com (8.7.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA04292; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 10:47:03 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199602271647.KAA04292@jake.lodgenet.com> X-Authentication-Warning: jake.lodgenet.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95 To: Narvi cc: "Serge A. Babkin" , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: as(1) patch & dis In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 27 Feb 1996 14:16:04 +0200." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 10:47:03 -0600 From: "Eric L. Hernes" Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > > Sad... > Where will I get the SCO from... > So I wont see what the drivers do to write my own ones... > Most of the code that you need has already been written, it's part of gdb. I've wanted to rip the disassembly stuff out of gdb and make it stand alone, but haven't found the time (or really needed it that bad, I've got several copies of SCO) gdb already knows how to parse COFFs, so it shouldn't be too bad. Actually, SCO's dis(CP) from 3.2v4.2 runs as well under ibcs2 as on real SCO. Most of the development system does, except for masm, and some other programs that need (use) a vm86 call. anyone know why SCO's syslog implementation needs vm86? > > -SB > > > eric. -- erich@lodgenet.com erich@rrnet.com