From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 20 06:05:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FA61065676 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:05:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 501C78FC1B for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11895 invoked by uid 399); 20 Jul 2010 06:05:29 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO laptop.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 20 Jul 2010 06:05:29 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:05:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Kostik Belousov In-Reply-To: <20100718194109.GU2381@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Message-ID: References: <20100717192128.GM2381@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20100718103003.GO2381@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4C43541C.3060101@FreeBSD.org> <20100718194109.GU2381@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Rui Paulo Subject: Re: Why is intr taking up so much cpu? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:05:30 -0000 On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote: > When intr time starts accumulating again, try to do > "procstat -kk " and correlate the clock thread tid > with the backtrace. Might be, it helps to guess what callouts are eating > the CPU. Ok, I thought I was going to be able to do this easily but I didn't realize that the numbers in the second column were thread ids, and I don't know how to "correlate the clock thread tid with the backtrace." Can you give me a hint? :) Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso