From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 01:02:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFD70788 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 01:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B88524FB for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 01:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.60]) by qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id aoh51o0021HzFnQ59p20YQ; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 01:02:00 +0000 Received: from kirby.cyberbotx.com ([107.5.48.95]) by omta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ap1y1o00c23DSHF3ap1zPp; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 01:02:00 +0000 Message-ID: <53E02D06.8000105@cyberbotx.com> Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 21:01:58 -0400 From: Naram Qashat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: Does pkg automatically download INDEX? References: <53DE7266.5000606@cyberbotx.com> <53DE8623.1090208@infracaninophile.co.uk> <53DE8EBD.4090303@cyberbotx.com> <53DE934C.101@FreeBSD.org> <53DE9B38.2000805@cyberbotx.com> <20140804214127.000030c9@Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20140804214127.000030c9@Leidinger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1407200520; bh=a5ara5P2uuXKA1urrDSwWMwDMS09n9Eq8eoZVjxc8j4=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=D21L7L64uhP+b/I1KXpeJ1TE5eZFcAyoZgYld1yJgs9FBy1mIbSSOxIbN+3tx87wl AhregRJ6VBsvDHvj4cfrv289yMN1xpc4y16UgMO6Xp9EjdqDmAq8f9dn5DMHs24/cl IHygx/XZw6q41iXGR7fDPLNS+jumjgWn+9w1Ah3v7nSEFgYbTCEoCw5vZtDrW401CJ eCtQqNBvFJ3ppR6XepUU6sxLWfKCoXaU/WLDHeBY+UMefzJlxn0RrnI1k8Lmj7K23L FgRbZLRYeAog3hHO6EDfeLflw5tQ2TjILPA5mlMcrBdlyo+RyENd0JzH59X364Dkhu b1g9acN2hzTwQ== Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 01:02:02 -0000 On 08/04/14 15:41, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Sun, 03 Aug 2014 16:27:36 -0400 > Naram Qashat wrote: > >> On 08/03/14 15:53, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> On 03/08/2014 20:34, Naram Qashat wrote: >>>> Well, I've been using the command line arguments of "-voL '='", and >>>> looking at the man page for pkg-version, as far as I can tell, it >>>> shouldn't be downloading INDEX, since I do have INDEX-9 on my >>>> system. >>> >>> pkg(8) doesn't download or attempt to build an INDEX at all. It >>> can use one if one happens to be already available, but not >>> otherwise. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Matthew >> >> I'm at a bit of a loss, then. While I can't say for sure if pkg is >> doing something unintended, there seems to be something on my system >> that is downloading INDEX without my knowledge. >> >> My usual way of updating my INDEX is using p5-FreeBSD-Portindex to >> generate the INDEX file, and using that INDEX to update the files >> that portupgrade uses. I run that manually, so I have nothing that >> would do that for me automatically, to my knowledge. > > How do you update the ports tree, with portsnap or with svn? Portnap > also updates the index. > > Bye, > Alexander. I update via svn, so that isn't getting the INDEX updates. Thanks, Naram Qashat