Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:20:38 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/pcre and WITH_UTF8 Message-ID: <20050221192038.GI9175@voodoo.oberon.net> In-Reply-To: <200502211948.46005.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <20050221142951.GA48781@pc5-179.lri.fr> <200502211744.52024.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <20050221181645.GH9175@voodoo.oberon.net> <200502211948.46005.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 07:48:41PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > I could split net/gnunet into: > > gnunet-gdbm, gnunet-mysql, gnunet-tdb, gnunet-bdb3, gnunet-sqlite, > > gnunet-ipv6, gnunet-guile, hence we get 7 slave ports and one master > > port. > > That would certainly be better than the current status quo, which makes the > gnunet package rather bare-bones - at least you should convert it to OPTIONS > and default them to on. I have a slight sceptical attitude towards OPTIONS :) Well, at least there is a possibility to do it without slaves creation, but patching OPTIONS to support it would be even better. > However, you wouldn't need to bother with a gnunet-ipv6 port - > even the option is rather gratuitous. Yeah, that's right. -Kirill
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050221192038.GI9175>