From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 19 22:02:20 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E60310656A7
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:02:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from thierry@pompo.net)
Received: from smtpfb2-g21.free.fr (smtpfb2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.10])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753768FC08
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:02:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (smtp5-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.5])
	by smtpfb2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED667CA8882
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:45:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from graf.pompo.net (unknown [78.225.128.39])
	by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFDED48074
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:45:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 1DF9911457; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:45:16 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:45:16 +0200
From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20100819214516.GD15775@graf.pompo.net>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
References: <20100819143830.GJ35140@azathoth.lan>
	<AANLkTimY=FJas-oXkWwO07QtaD+GrLockgJ_SZQJ7UHM@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimhh2vOtXUb-frzWcZmANWyEC7oPtTgepzvOtSB@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C6DA0FA.7080203@DataIX.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <4C6DA0FA.7080203@DataIX.net>
X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc;
	y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs:
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE i386
Organization: Kabbale Eros
X-PGP: 0xC71405A2
Subject: Re: what next for the pkg_install rewrite
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:02:20 -0000

Le Jeu 19 aoû 10 à 23:24:10 +0200, jhell <jhell@DataIX.net>
 écrivait :

> 	As well I would also like to see something done about packages that
> don't need to be upgraded because they are neither platform or arch
> dependent but yet they are upgraded due to being listed as a dependent
> of another port that needs to be upgraded. For example any package that
> may be type shell script does not need updating due to a major lib
> version bump of for say libpng.

For this purpose, it's already possible to check if the port set
NO_BUILD.

Regards,
-- 
Th. Thomas.