From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Nov 7 16: 0:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC6437B401 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 16:00:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from host4.rpi.wulimasters.net (host4.rpi.wulimasters.net [128.113.36.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08BCD43E42 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 16:00:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dolemite@host4.rpi.wulimasters.net) Received: (qmail 86835 invoked by uid 1001); 8 Nov 2002 00:01:59 -0000 Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 00:01:59 +0000 From: Alex Newman To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Netgraph could be a router also. Message-ID: <20021108000159.GE86595@host4.rpi.wulimasters.net> Reply-To: dolemite@wuli.nu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Could we implement {bgp & ospf} in netgraph? What would need to be done assuming the Netgraph TCP/IP happen? Is this a bad idea. Alex Newman dolemite@wuli.nu http://www.wuli.nu/users/dolemite To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message