Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Sep 2001 04:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Tom Hukins <tom@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/28521: inconsistency: daemontools and serialmail
Message-ID:  <200109231100.f8NB08580644@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/28521; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Tom Hukins <tom@FreeBSD.org>
To: Andre Goeree <abgoeree@uwnet.nl>
Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org,
	nbm@FreeBSD.org, dom@happygiraffe.net
Subject: Re: ports/28521: inconsistency: daemontools and serialmail
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 11:56:37 +0100

 [Summary: Both the daemontools and serialmail ports install a program
 called setlock in the same location.  Can we resolve this?]
 
 On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:26:36PM +0200, Andre Goeree wrote:
 > 
 > In this particular case (serialmail/daemontools) the conflicting 
 > files do not differ much. The files are from the same developer 
 > and have probably the same function (are interchangeable/compatible).
 
 Right.  The code for both versions of setlock is near enough
 identical, from our point of view.
 
 > The problem comes when one of the ports gets deinstalled and deletes
 > the conflicting file, it could still be needed by the other port.
 > A solution would be to not to delete the file but to display a message
 > about deleting the file manually when it's no longer needed, this is
 > already common practice with users (postgresql).
 
 I'm the maintainer of the serialmail port, and I'm copying this
 message to Neil, the maintainer of daemontools, and Dom, the
 maintainer of daemontools53.
 
 If it weren't for the daemontools53 port, I'd suggest that serialmail
 be modified to not install setlock but depend on daemontools instead.
 However, some users may have daemontools53 installed instead which
 does not include setlock.  Most of the files in daemontools are
 daemontools53 have identical names, though, so users can't install
 both ports.
 
 I can't think of a neat way to deal with this, but I thought it might
 be useful to mention my thoughts so far.
 
 Tom

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109231100.f8NB08580644>